Manage the threat, not just the case.
For IP threats too persistent or widespread for one-off cases. We provide independent oversight of your programme: what to prioritise, who does what, and how each case informs the next decision.
Discuss your programme →Repeat activity and assessed links can make a target more significant than listing volume alone. Further action depends on the evidence and available options.
Each case should improve the next decision.
Intelligence from earlier investigations, targets and actions informs what happens next, so the programme doesn't keep starting from zero.
One strategic view. Programmes often use different providers in different markets. That can be entirely appropriate. The problem arises when nobody holds the complete view.
Oliver WalshFounder & Principal
Is this for you?
When individual cases are no longer enough.
Why does it keep coming back?
Infringement is persistent, and each case starts from scratch.
You getContinuing intelligence reviewVolumeWhere do we start?
Large volumes of infringement data and no clear way to rank them.
You getThreat and target prioritisationMany providersWho has the whole picture?
Several providers across markets, and local activity disconnected from regional objectives.
You getSenior oversight across marketsBudgetIs the spend working?
Activity is being reported, but it is unclear what is changing or where the budget should go next.
You getProgramme reporting and resource recommendationsHow we approach it
Prioritise what matters
Not every seller, listing or target deserves the same attention. We separate volume from significance.
Connect intelligence to action
Monitoring data creates visibility, not strategy. We decide which signals deserve deeper work.
Report to support decisions
What changed, what matters now, and where resources should move next.
A mature programme should become better at saying yes and better at saying no.
The programme runs across all four stages of our method. How we work →
Need one action rather than a programme? Enforcement Strategy & Delivery →
What we can manage
- Prioritisation
- Which threats and targets deserve attention, and which don't.
- Coordination
- Investigators, providers and evidence across markets, under one strategic view.
- Planning
- Investigation direction and enforcement planning, scoped case by case.
- Reporting
- What changed, what was learned and where resources should move next.
We measure the programme by what changed: target selection, intelligence turned into action, and budget moved to where it matters. Not by how busy it was.
What to expect
Strategic oversight doesn't mean unlimited execution. Investigation and enforcement are scoped separately, only where the intelligence justifies it.
First call
Free, confidential and without obligation. We can sign an NDA before you share confidential details.
Written proposal
The scope, timing and fee are set out in writing, with oversight and any execution scoped separately.
Set-up
We agree the priorities, the providers involved and what reporting needs to answer.
Review and reprioritise
We review what changed and where resources should move next.
Not sure you need a programme? Start with an assessment →
What are you trying to manage?
Tell us how the programme works today and where prioritisation, coordination or decision-making is getting difficult.
Discuss your programme